According to Fortune, the Tema Electrification ETF (VOLT) has surged 33% year to date, significantly outperforming the S&P 500’s roughly 17% gain over the same period. Analysts at Ned Davis Research are recommending the fund as an “Overweight” investment, projecting it could deliver approximately 20% relative outperformance versus the S&P 500 by 2027. The fund’s thesis centers on AI’s massive electricity demands, with global electricity consumption from data centers expected to more than double to 945 terawatt hours by 2030 from 415 terawatt hours in 2024 according to International Energy Agency projections. Major holdings include Powell Industries, NextEra Energy, and Bel Fuse, with the $168.3 million fund positioned to benefit from what analysts call a “grid-upgrade super cycle” driven by datacenter demand and aging infrastructure that earned a D+ rating in the latest American Society of Civil Engineers report. This creates an intriguing investment landscape where the companies powering AI may prove more valuable than the AI companies themselves.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
The Infrastructure Bottleneck Nobody Saw Coming
What makes the VOLT ETF’s performance particularly compelling is that it addresses a fundamental constraint in the AI revolution that most investors overlooked. While everyone focused on NVIDIA’s chips and OpenAI’s models, the real bottleneck was always going to be electricity. The scale of power required for advanced AI systems is staggering – OpenAI’s Stargate project alone will consume enough electricity to power entire cities, representing a level of concentrated energy demand that our grid wasn’t designed to handle. This isn’t just about building more data centers; it’s about fundamentally rethinking how we generate, transmit, and distribute power at scales we haven’t seen since the electrification of America in the early 20th century.
Geographic Winners and Losers
The AI power boom creates clear geographic disparities that will reshape regional economies and investment patterns. Areas with abundant, cheap electricity and existing transmission infrastructure – particularly the Southeast, Texas, and Pacific Northwest – are positioned to become the new energy hubs of the digital economy. Meanwhile, regions with constrained power grids or high electricity costs may find themselves unable to compete for AI infrastructure investments. This dynamic could accelerate the economic divergence between energy-rich and energy-poor states, creating winners beyond just the companies in the VOLT ETF. Utilities with access to renewable energy sources and regions with favorable regulatory environments for grid expansion stand to benefit disproportionately, while areas reliant on aging fossil fuel plants or facing transmission constraints may see economic opportunities migrate elsewhere.
The Hidden Risks in Plain Sight
While the thesis behind electrification ETFs appears solid, several underappreciated risks could disrupt this narrative. The aging U.S. grid infrastructure presents not just an opportunity but a significant execution challenge – regulatory hurdles, permitting delays, and supply chain constraints could slow the necessary upgrades. Additionally, the concentration of the VOLT ETF in specific sectors creates vulnerability to technological disruption. If more energy-efficient AI chips emerge or novel cooling technologies reduce power requirements significantly, the projected electricity demand growth might not materialize as expected. Investors should also consider that utility stocks traditionally trade at lower multiples due to their regulated nature, which could limit upside even amid growing demand.
Broader Market Implications
The success of thematic ETFs like VOLT signals a maturation in how investors approach technological transformations. Rather than simply betting on the technology creators, sophisticated investors are increasingly looking at the entire ecosystem – particularly the infrastructure layers that enable new technologies to scale. This represents a fundamental shift from the dot-com era, where infrastructure investments were largely overlooked until bottlenecks became critical. The current AI investment cycle, with tech giants planning nearly $400 billion in capital expenditures for 2025 alone, suggests that infrastructure plays may offer more predictable returns than the volatile AI software and semiconductor sectors. As the AI revolution progresses, we’re likely to see more specialized ETFs targeting other constrained resources, from cooling systems to specialized construction services.
Strategic Considerations for Different Investors
For retail investors, the VOLT ETF offers diversified exposure to a theme that would be difficult to replicate through individual stock picking. However, the fund’s relatively small size ($168.3 million in assets) and concentration in 29 holdings creates liquidity and volatility risks that larger, more established ETFs don’t face. Institutional investors might prefer to build similar exposure through direct investments in the underlying companies or through more established utility and infrastructure ETFs with greater liquidity. What’s clear from Tema’s approach is that we’re entering an era where technological progress and physical infrastructure are becoming increasingly intertwined, creating investment opportunities that transcend traditional sector boundaries.
