According to Forbes, music industry executives estimate as much as 10% of music streams are “fake,” with a JPMorgan analysis revealing that programming a phone to play a 30-second track on loop for 24 hours could generate $1,200 in monthly royalties. The problem spans the entire industry, with University of Texas professor Eric Drott calling it “a bit of an open secret that this is something various actors of every level of the music industry engage in.” Drake has specifically accused Universal Music Group of conspiring with unknown third parties to use bots to artificially inflate streams of Kendrick Lamar’s diss track “Not Like Us” on Spotify, allegations Spotify called “false” and “far-fetched” in court filings. Meanwhile, Spotify has removed over 75 million AI-generated tracks in the past year and is implementing new spam filters to combat the issue. This escalating battle reveals a fundamental tension in the streaming economy.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
The Economic Impact on Legitimate Artists
The core problem with artificial streaming isn’t just about inflated numbers—it’s about real money being diverted from working artists. When bots generate streams, they’re effectively stealing from the shared royalty pool that legitimate artists depend on for income. This creates a perverse incentive structure where fraudsters can earn significant revenue through automated methods while authentic creators see their per-stream rates decline. The $1,200 monthly figure from JPMorgan’s analysis demonstrates how lucrative systematic fraud can be, particularly for those uploading numerous tracks and scaling their operations.
Why Streaming Platforms Face Conflicting Priorities
Streaming services like Spotify operate in a delicate balance when addressing this issue. On one hand, they need to maintain credibility with artists and rights holders by combating fraud. On the other, they have financial incentives to downplay the scale of the problem to avoid spooking investors and advertisers. Spotify’s public acknowledgment that fraudulent streams “dilute the royalty pool” represents progress, but the company’s aggressive legal response to Drake’s allegations suggests they’re deeply concerned about the perception that they’re not doing enough. This tension becomes particularly acute during high-profile artist disputes, where accusations can quickly damage platform reputation.
How AI Is Escalating the Detection War
The removal of 75 million AI-generated tracks represents a new front in the streaming fraud battle. Artificial intelligence has dramatically lowered the barrier to creating convincing-sounding music at scale, enabling fraudsters to flood platforms with content specifically designed to game royalty systems. As Spotify rolls out new detection systems, fraudsters are simultaneously refining their methods, creating an arms race that requires constant technological investment. The platform’s upcoming spam filter represents the latest escalation, but it’s unlikely to be the final solution in what has become a cat-and-mouse game.
Broader Market Consequences
Beyond individual artist disputes, the prevalence of artificial streaming threatens to undermine the entire streaming economy’s credibility. If listeners and industry professionals begin questioning whether chart positions and streaming numbers reflect genuine popularity, the value proposition of streaming data for marketing, A&R decisions, and brand partnerships diminishes significantly. Spotify’s forceful denial of collusion allegations reflects how seriously they take these credibility concerns. The outcome of Drake’s legal appeal could set important precedents for how streaming platforms are held accountable for maintaining fair play counts.
The Path Toward More Authentic Metrics
Solving this systemic issue will require more than just better detection algorithms. The industry needs to develop new verification methods that can distinguish between genuine listener engagement and artificial amplification. This might include weighted streaming metrics that prioritize unique listeners over total plays, improved user behavior analysis, or blockchain-based tracking systems that create transparent audit trails. Until the industry develops more robust authentication methods, the 10% fraud estimate represents a significant drain on artist compensation and a persistent challenge to streaming’s legitimacy as the dominant music distribution model.
