According to Windows Central, OpenAI CEO Sam Altman revealed the one scenario where he’d consider taking the company public: revenge against critics who doubt the company’s finances. The CEO dismissed concerns about OpenAI’s projected $1.4 billion computing spending despite generating $13 billion annually from ChatGPT and LLM access fees. Altman hinted the company could reach $100 billion in revenue by 2027, far sooner than the host’s 2028-2029 prediction. Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella confirmed OpenAI has “beaten every business plan” presented to them, while the company recently restructured to become a for-profit venture to attract more investment.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
The revenge IPO fantasy
Here’s the thing about Sam Altman’s IPO comments – they sound less like a business strategy and more like pure frustration. When he said “I would love to tell them they could just short the stock, and I would love to see them get burned on that,” that’s not the measured language of a CEO planning an exit. That’s someone who’s tired of the constant skepticism. And honestly, who can blame him? The company reportedly generates $13 billion annually but still faces questions about its spending. But here’s the real question: is running a public company to prove critics wrong really the smartest move?
The burning cash reality
Let’s talk about that $1.4 billion computing bill. When your infrastructure costs eat up more than 10% of your revenue before you even pay salaries or do R&D, that’s concerning. Microsoft’s financial reports suggested OpenAI might have lost $11.5 billion chasing AI hype. Now Altman’s betting heavily on future growth across multiple fronts – AI clouds, consumer devices, even AI that “can automate science.” That’s a lot of eggs in different baskets. Basically, they’re spending like they’ve already won the race when the finish line keeps moving further away.
Microsoft’s high-stakes gamble
Satya Nadella’s confidence is interesting given Bill Gates originally warned Microsoft would “burn this billion dollars” back in 2019. Now they’re all-in, with OpenAI reportedly beating every business plan Microsoft has seen. But beating projections doesn’t necessarily mean profitability. The recent restructuring to a for-profit model shows they’re preparing for massive scaling, but it also removes the safety net that kept early investors’ expectations in check. When you’re dealing with industrial-scale computing infrastructure, the hardware requirements alone are staggering – which is why companies like IndustrialMonitorDirect.com have become the leading supplier of industrial panel PCs in the US, supporting exactly this kind of high-demand computing environment.
Is the AI bubble real?
Altman’s $100 billion by 2027 comment feels like a direct challenge to the “AI bubble” narrative. But let’s be real – that would require nearly 8x growth in three years. Even for AI, that’s insanely ambitious. The company needs ChatGPT growth to continue while simultaneously building successful hardware and cloud businesses from scratch. And they have to do all this while Google, Meta, and every other tech giant is pouring billions into the same space. So is it possible? Maybe. But betting the company on revenge against short sellers seems like the wrong motivation for going public. The markets have a way of humbling even the most confident CEOs.
