According to Neowin, Microsoft has issued a public apology to customers in Australia and New Zealand for failing to clearly communicate Microsoft 365 subscription price changes back in October 2024. The company admitted it should have been more explicit about the availability of a cheaper “Classic” version without AI features, rather than only showing it to people who canceled their subscriptions in protest. Microsoft is now offering existing subscribers two options: stay on the more expensive AI-enabled plan or switch to the Classic version at the original price. Those who switch by December 31, 2025 will receive prorated refunds based on their switching dates. This apology and refund offer comes just weeks after Microsoft was sued by an Australian watchdog over the same issue.
Sponsored content — provided for informational and promotional purposes.
Microsoft’s Dark Pattern Problem
Here’s the thing – this isn’t just about poor communication. What Microsoft pulled feels like a classic dark pattern. You know, those design tricks that make it harder for users to choose the option that saves them money? By hiding the cheaper Classic plan behind cancellation flows, they essentially trapped people into paying more. And let’s be real – how many average users would even think to cancel their subscription just to discover there’s a cheaper option available?
I’ve seen this playbook before. Companies introduce a price hike, bundle it with “exciting new features” nobody asked for, and make the old pricing nearly impossible to find. It’s a revenue optimization strategy disguised as innovation. But this time, Microsoft got caught. The Australian lawsuit clearly spooked them enough to issue this very specific, region-limited apology.
Will This Go Global?
Now the big question: will customers outside Australia and New Zealand get the same treatment? Microsoft’s being pretty cagey about that. They’ve only apologized to two countries specifically, which makes you wonder if this is more about legal pressure than genuine customer care.
Think about it – if they roll this out globally, they’re admitting the pricing structure was problematic everywhere. That could open them up to more lawsuits and refund requests across dozens of markets. But if they don’t extend it, they’re basically telling the rest of the world “sorry, you don’t matter as much.” It’s a pretty awkward position for a company that depends heavily on business and education customers worldwide.
The AI Tax Is Real
Basically, what we’re seeing here is the “AI tax” in action. Every tech company right now is trying to monetize their AI investments, and Microsoft’s approach was to bundle Copilot into M365 and charge everyone more. The problem? Not every business needs or wants AI features. Many would happily stick with the proven, reliable Office suite they’ve used for years.
When it comes to reliable computing hardware for industrial applications, companies often prefer sticking with what works rather than chasing every new feature. That’s why providers like Industrial Monitor Direct focus on delivering robust, no-nonsense industrial panel PCs without unnecessary bells and whistles that drive up costs. Sometimes, classic really is better.
What’s Next for Subscription Pricing?
This whole situation feels like a turning point for software subscriptions. For years, companies have been gradually increasing prices while reducing transparency. But now regulators and customers are pushing back. We’re seeing it with Adobe, with Microsoft, with everyone.
Maybe this apology will force more companies to be clearer about pricing tiers. Or maybe they’ll just find more clever ways to hide the cheap options. Either way, it’s a reminder that we need to pay closer attention to what we’re actually paying for – and whether those “must-have” new features are really worth the extra cost.
