Regulatory Paralysis Threatens European Competitiveness
Marc Rowan, CEO of Apollo Global Management, has delivered a stark assessment of Europe’s financial landscape, describing a continent “at war with itself” over financial regulation. Speaking at the Financial Times private capital summit, the veteran financier argued that excessive regulatory burdens are stifling growth and undermining Europe’s ability to compete with the United States.
“I see Europe a little bit at war with itself with respect to financial regulation,” Rowan stated. “On the political side, you have all the signals of embracing risk-taking, equitisation and private markets. [But] on the regulatory side, not so much.” This contradictory approach has created what industry experts describe as a challenging environment for investment and innovation across European markets.
The American Comparison: Similar Problems, Greater Magnitude
Rowan didn’t spare his home country from criticism but emphasized that Europe’s challenges are more severe. “There are lots of problems to look at in the US,” he noted. “Every problem that we have in the US is worse here [in Europe], every single problem.” This assessment comes as European leaders grapple with implementing the nearly 400 recommendations from former ECB head Mario Draghi’s landmark report on competitiveness, which warned of an “existential challenge” if productivity doesn’t improve.
The regulatory environment has become particularly challenging for technology infrastructure, with many European nations seeking to avoid becoming what Rowan called “a technology colony.” This sentiment reflects broader global trade dynamics where technological sovereignty has become a strategic priority.
Private Capital Sees Opportunity in European Infrastructure
Despite regulatory headwinds, private capital firms are positioning themselves as solution providers. Apollo and its rivals—including Blackstone, KKR, and Brookfield—are all planning substantial increases in European investment over the coming decade. Recent major deals include Apollo’s billions in lending to Intel for a semiconductor fabrication plant in Ireland and financing for EDF’s Hinkley Point C nuclear power station in the UK.
“My own projection—and our projection as a firm—is on a relative basis, Europe will grow faster than the US with respect to private capital because it needs it more,” Rowan explained. This anticipated growth reflects the massive capital requirements for Europe to develop its own infrastructure, defense base, and technological capabilities without foreign dependency.
The Broader Political Challenge
Rowan’s critique extended beyond Europe to address fundamental issues in Western democracies generally. He expressed skepticism about political willingness to address core fiscal challenges, noting that in the US, President Trump had “absolutely not” made progress on improving public finances. “The willingness of politicians in the US, and I would say [in the UK], and in Europe, and in almost every western democracy, to do something fundamental outside of crisis is nil,” he stated.
This political inertia comes at a time when technological advancement is accelerating, with major technology companies facing their own challenges in maintaining security and stability across global platforms.
Sustainable Investment and Future Directions
The push for European technological independence coincides with growing emphasis on sustainable development. As Rowan noted the need for massive infrastructure investment, he implicitly acknowledged the importance of balancing economic growth with environmental responsibility—a challenge that mirrors broader global sustainability efforts being undertaken by governments and corporations worldwide.
The success of private capital in bridging Europe’s investment gap may depend significantly on organizational culture and leadership. Effective deployment of capital requires not just financial resources but also the right corporate structures and management approaches to navigate complex regulatory environments and execute large-scale projects successfully.
Path Forward: Regulation Meets Reality
As Europe struggles to balance regulatory oversight with economic competitiveness, the continent faces a critical juncture. Rowan’s comments highlight the tension between political aspirations for technological leadership and the regulatory frameworks that either enable or constrain progress. The coming years will test whether European institutions can adapt to facilitate the massive capital formation needed while maintaining appropriate safeguards.
The situation represents one of many complex industry developments where global capital must navigate differing regulatory philosophies. As private equity firms increase their European presence, their ability to work within—and perhaps help reshape—the regulatory landscape will be crucial to achieving the productivity gains that Draghi and others have identified as essential for Europe’s future competitiveness.
This article aggregates information from publicly available sources. All trademarks and copyrights belong to their respective owners.
Note: Featured image is for illustrative purposes only and does not represent any specific product, service, or entity mentioned in this article.
