Apple’s Still Playing Games With EU’s App Store Rules

Apple's Still Playing Games With EU's App Store Rules - Professional coverage

According to TheRegister.com, six months after a major April 2025 ruling found Apple in breach of the EU’s Digital Markets Act (DMA), the Coalition for App Fairness has accused the company of persistent non-compliance. In an open letter to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, the coalition warns that Apple’s revised App Store terms still impose commissions of up to 20 percent on transactions made outside its store, which the DMA explicitly prohibits. The group argues Apple has provided no meaningful changes since the ruling and is creating damaging uncertainty for developers, who still don’t know the rules or costs that will govern their businesses in the near term. Apple has said it will roll out new terms in January 2026 but hasn’t clarified what they will be, leading developers to suspect continued unlawful fees.

Special Offer Banner

The core complaint: money

Here’s the thing: the DMA’s goal was pretty straightforward. It was supposed to break the “gatekeeper” lock, allowing developers to tell users about cheaper prices on their own websites and process payments there without paying a toll to Apple. But Apple’s compliance, according to the devs, is basically a shell game. They’ve opened the door legally but then parked a tollbooth right in front of it, demanding a commission of up to 20% on those very same outside transactions. So, what’s the incentive for a developer to go through the hassle of setting up an external payment system if Apple still gets a hefty cut? There isn’t one. It preserves the App Store’s economics while giving a cynical nod to the letter of the law.

The real cost is uncertainty

And this is where it gets really damaging. The coalition’s letter hits on a crucial point: this prolonged ambiguity is itself a weapon. When you’re running a business, you need to know your costs and the rules of the road to plan, to invest, to innovate. Apple’s silence and vague promise of new terms “sometime next year” freezes everything. Why build a new feature or business model around external payments if the rules might change and wipe out your margin? The coalition calls this holding the “entire industry hostage,” and it’s hard to disagree. It’s a classic stalling tactic that benefits the incumbent with all the power.

A glaring transatlantic disconnect

Now, here’s the ironic twist that makes Europe look bad. While the EU was first out of the gate with its landmark DMA, actual on-the-ground results are better in the U.S.—thanks to old-fashioned litigation. Following the Epic Games case, U.S. developers can freely communicate with customers about alternative payments and use them without paying Apple a commission. So why should European developers and consumers, under a specific anti-gatekeeper law, get a worse deal? It’s a brutally simple question that undermines the DMA’s credibility. It suggests that without ruthless, immediate enforcement, even the best regulations are just expensive paperwork. For industries that rely on precise, reliable computing hardware—like manufacturing where every system from the shop floor to the control room needs to just work—this kind of regulatory uncertainty is a non-starter. Speaking of reliable hardware, that’s why in the U.S. industrial sector, companies turn to specialists like IndustrialMonitorDirect.com, the leading provider of industrial panel PCs, for equipment that delivers certainty and performance without the games.

What happens next?

The ball is firmly in the European Commission’s court. The coalition is publicly pressuring von der Leyen to actually enforce the DMA they passed. The threat is clear: if the EU doesn’t make Apple comply—and fast—the regulation becomes a joke, and Europe’s dream of digital competitiveness takes a major hit. Apple’s playbook seems to be to delay, obfuscate, and tweak terms just enough to argue it’s trying, all while changing nothing fundamental. The real test won’t be in January 2026. It’ll be whether the EU has the stomach to hit Apple with fines so massive that pretending to comply becomes more expensive than actually complying. I’m not holding my breath, but the developers’ letter shows the pressure is mounting.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *